collection60@hotmail.com

I have a lot of music files.

Is there someway I can batch process them, to create a new bunch of
music files, which have been overlaid with some subliminal messages?

This way I can listen to the messages on my iPod even when listening to
my normal music.

Ideally, it would do this:

1) Take all the music from my iTunes music folder.
2) Let me choose a second list of music,w hich will be the subliminal
messages.
3) Let me choose the relative volume of the second list.
4) Just batch process the entire thing, into a new folder, with similar
but not identical names. Maybe Fred.mp3 becomes Fred_sub.mp3. Each
music file would be overlaid from start to finish with some subliminal
messages. The messages would be rotated, perhaps randomly ordered so
that each message has just as likely a chance of being played as the
others.

Is there any software to do this?

Or would I need to write it myself? I can write software for Mac,
although I don't know anything about processing audio.

Jim

Just out of curiosity......Do you live in a dark castle at the end of a long
dirt road and run around in a white lab coat?

--
Pray for success please. :-)
http://web.nccray.net/jshodges/mommasaid/sss.htm
<collection60@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147538906.543587.228790@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>I have a lot of music files.
>
> Is there someway I can batch process them, to create a new bunch of
> music files, which have been overlaid with some subliminal messages?
>
> This way I can listen to the messages on my iPod even when listening to
> my normal music.
>
> Ideally, it would do this:
>
> 1) Take all the music from my iTunes music folder.
> 2) Let me choose a second list of music,w hich will be the subliminal
> messages.
> 3) Let me choose the relative volume of the second list.
> 4) Just batch process the entire thing, into a new folder, with similar
> but not identical names. Maybe Fred.mp3 becomes Fred_sub.mp3. Each
> music file would be overlaid from start to finish with some subliminal
> messages. The messages would be rotated, perhaps randomly ordered so
> that each message has just as likely a chance of being played as the
> others.
>
> Is there any software to do this?
>
> Or would I need to write it myself? I can write software for Mac,
> although I don't know anything about processing audio.
>

D Parker

Why do you want to know? Is it going to have something to do with
manipulating the minds of women? If so count me in!!

DP
<collection60@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147538906.543587.228790@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>I have a lot of music files.
>
> Is there someway I can batch process them, to create a new bunch of
> music files, which have been overlaid with some subliminal messages?
>
> This way I can listen to the messages on my iPod even when listening to
> my normal music.
>
> Ideally, it would do this:
>
> 1) Take all the music from my iTunes music folder.
> 2) Let me choose a second list of music,w hich will be the subliminal
> messages.
> 3) Let me choose the relative volume of the second list.
> 4) Just batch process the entire thing, into a new folder, with similar
> but not identical names. Maybe Fred.mp3 becomes Fred_sub.mp3. Each
> music file would be overlaid from start to finish with some subliminal
> messages. The messages would be rotated, perhaps randomly ordered so
> that each message has just as likely a chance of being played as the
> others.
>
> Is there any software to do this?
>
> Or would I need to write it myself? I can write software for Mac,
> although I don't know anything about processing audio.
>

PapaNate

> > Is there someway I can batch process them, to create a new bunch of
> > music files, which have been overlaid with some subliminal messages?

Yes there is. But dammed if I'm going to share it with you.

Now get back to that *Stop Smoking Clinic* and stop trying to cheat.

hitmewithit

I think you need to go see a Dr.
Subliminal messages to learn something?
I think you will find that it has no real scientific proof and is most
likely a load of crap..

HitMeWithIt
MP3@3PM Free MP3 Downloads:
http://mp33pm.blogspot.com

collection60@hotmail.com

It's a good question though.

There's no evidence that smoking is good for you but some people still
do it.

I'd like to do this kind of "self-made" subliminal messaging, and
that's enough I think?

All I need is a technical answer, not anything else. No one knows about
this sort of batch-processing feature? Must be someone who knows about
most of the popular mp3 mixing software and knows if they can be batch
processed.

Laurence Payne

On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:00:48 +1000, "D Parker"
<nospamozskipper@hotmailnospam.com.> wrote:

> Why do you want to know? Is it going to have something to do with
>manipulating the minds of women? If so count me in!!

"Minds"? "Women"? Sorry, I'm not quite with you?

<ducks for cover>

D Parker

<collection60@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147599874.632176.321590@d71g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> It's a good question though.
>
> There's no evidence that smoking is good for you but some people still
> do it.
>
> I'd like to do this kind of "self-made" subliminal messaging, and
> that's enough I think?
>
> All I need is a technical answer, not anything else. No one knows about
> this sort of batch-processing feature? Must be someone who knows about
> most of the popular mp3 mixing software and knows if they can be batch
> processed.
>

Get a copy of mixmeister.. you will have to do it song by song tho...
however you could lay down several tracks and create one long one.. then use
"wavsplitter" to separate them all.

DP

collection60@hotmail.com

Thanks.

Geoff@home

Laurence Payne wrote:
> On Sun, 14 May 2006 11:00:48 +1000, "D Parker"
> <nospamozskipper@hotmailnospam.com.> wrote:
>
>> Why do you want to know? Is it going to have something to do with
>> manipulating the minds of women? If so count me in!!
>
> "Minds"? "Women"? Sorry, I'm not quite with you?
>
> <ducks for cover>

How about, yes it is easy (send me all your money) to implant subliminal
messages (send me all your money) in songs, etc.

geoff

Chevdo

In article <1147599874.632176.321590@d71g2000cwd.googlegroups .com>,
collection60@hotmail.com says...
>
>It's a good question though.
>
>There's no evidence that smoking is good for you but some people still
>do it.
>
>I'd like to do this kind of "self-made" subliminal messaging, and
>that's enough I think?
>
>All I need is a technical answer, not anything else. No one knows about
>this sort of batch-processing feature? Must be someone who knows about
>most of the popular mp3 mixing software and knows if they can be batch
>processed.
>

sorry, I'm not going to help you waste your time with nonsense, just as I'm not
going to buy you a pack of cigarettes.

hank alrich

<collection60@hotmail.com> wrote:

> All I need is a technical answer, not anything else.

I gave you that already.

> No one knows about
> this sort of batch-processing feature?

This isn't about "batch processing"; this is simple audio mixing, as
done in any more-than-two-tracks DAW. You have a small truckload of
choices.

> Must be someone who knows about most of the popular mp3 mixing software
> and knows if they can be batch processed.

Again, what you're after is not batch processing. Please, look into what
Digital Audio Workstation applications can be sued for, because what you
actually need to do here is one of their basic features.

--
ha

Chevdo

In article <1hfc5rc.79lcmiqjv8w0N%walkinay@thegrid.net>, walkinay@thegrid.net
says...
>
>Again, what you're after is not batch processing. Please, look into what
>Digital Audio Workstation applications can be sued for, because what you
>actually need to do here is one of their basic features.
>

You can sue companies that make DAW software for not including features you
want??

collection60@hotmail.com

Or tell me where the newsagents is?