<BJtheDJ@the.Controls> wrote in message
news:fgs3hvcmjplo7jocg96mg04oo2bmkdue2d@news-text.blueyonder.co.uk...
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:40:28 +0100, "FUQ" <fuq@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >D Side <pop@goestheemail.com> wrote in message
> >news:seBPa.46896$9C6.2407100@wards.force9.net...
> >> I so love keygens and cracks - it's just the best way to get a virus
into
> >> someones machine :-)
> >
> >thats bullshit. almost all cracks and keygens r clean.
>
> So are 'most' of the young ladies that we meet in the course of
> entertaining the public - but that deosn't mean that I wouldn't use a
> condom with each and every one of them, given the chance.
Firstly, i said almost all, not most. By that i mean 999999 in 1000000.
Secondly, using a virus scanner is a lot more reliable than using a condom.
> You have as little likelihood of knowing which keygen program is
> virus-free as of knowing which affable young lady is virus-free :)
Wrong. U can bet ur life that if u search on astalavista.box.sk for a
crack/keygen, any u find will be clean. If u scan them for viruses, which is
a bit more difficult with women, u can then be
99.99999999999999999999999999999999999% sure it is clean.
as i said in a reply to another post:
Why would crack teams put a virus in their
own cracks? Why would the sites that host them do it?
The only chance u have of getting a virus from a crack is if u download a
fake or infected crack with p2p software and even then theres barely any
chance if u scan the files before using them. In fact, in years of using
them ive yet to come across one single infected file.
